Client case

An Insurance Company Chooses WSO2 as a Vendor to Displace MuleSoft

An Insurance Company selected WSO2 to displace MuleSoft, due to TCO and overall ROI benefits, and open-source licensing and flexible engagement models.

Scroll
Client Case Insurance company

Background

The customer is a leading insurance company in the Nordic region with a market capitalization of more than $3 billion. The insurance industry is a highly competitive, innovation-driven industry where technology plays a key role.

To provide insurance services such as claims, pensions, asset management, etc., in a fast, efficient manner, insurance companies need to have a solid technology platform. Technology platforms always evolve with time and according to the demands of the business leaders and sales teams who urge the technical teams to deliver new services quickly – at times without much consideration of management, governance, and the standards associated with these services. Sometimes existing technology platforms do not allow technical teams to think about these aspects due to the lack of features.

The technical teams have realized over time that around 250-300 APIs have been developed and managing these APIs can be challenging.

The challenge

Some key challenges identified in the existing platform are:

  • The requirement for a vendor-specific skill set. Even if there was a process in place to acquire talent externally, they didn’t meet expectations.
  • Vendor-specific training programs were too expensive and didn’t meet the level of expectation.
  • Around 90% of integrations were simple service-chaining scenarios. The complexity of developing them was too high.
  • Lack of accessibility to development-related materials such as libraries and freedom/flexibility to combine with the existing pipeline (based on Git and Java-based open technologies).
  • APIs without proper details on usage and performance and how to get the required support in case of a failure.
  • Lack of details on ownership, dependencies, and workload/usage patterns.
  • No proper governance on the API design, development, and publishing process which made the process of managing API development difficult.

We found that the WSO2 API Management platform was considerably more flexible and met our needs more closely than the Anypoint Platform. Our experience with WSO2 was that they were responsive to our needs and the result is a powerful solution to our API requirements.

WORDS FROM OUR CLIENT IN THIS CASE
Yenlo Written by our team of Yenlo experts

Receive this client case by mail

Fill in the form below and we’ll send you an unique download link in your mailbox in minutes. As always: Don’t forget to check your spam folder.

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.